[Haskell] Re: Haddock ignores fixity declarations?

[Simon Marlow]

Benjamin Franksen wrote:

> I just wanted to check the precedence of the (.) operator from Prelude 
> (http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/latest/html/libraries/base/Prelude.html) 
> and noticed with shock ;) that neither precedence levels nor fixity are 
> documented. Is this a known limitation of haddock? How hard would it be 
> to add this?

It's a known deficiency, insofar as it's mentioned in the TODO list for 
Haddock.  It wouldn't be too hard to fix, maybe a day's work.

Cheers,
	Simon