[Haskell] Re: Haddock ignores fixity declarations?
simonmarhaskell at gmail.com
Mon Feb 20 08:06:20 EST 2006
Benjamin Franksen wrote:
> I just wanted to check the precedence of the (.) operator from Prelude
> and noticed with shock ;) that neither precedence levels nor fixity are
> documented. Is this a known limitation of haddock? How hard would it be
> to add this?
It's a known deficiency, insofar as it's mentioned in the TODO list for
Haddock. It wouldn't be too hard to fix, maybe a day's work.
More information about the Haskell