[Haskell] PROPOSAL: class aliases

John Meacham john at repetae.net
Thu Oct 13 06:59:06 EDT 2005

On Thu, Oct 13, 2005 at 11:48:17AM +0100, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
> Andres Loeh <loeh at iai.uni-bonn.de> writes:
> > The way I understand the proposal, there are no FooBar dictionaries
> > ever. John said that this can be translated by a source-to-source
> > translation, so internally, a FooBar dictionary *is* a Foo and a
> > Bar dictionary.
> Ah yes, I was misled by the syntax, which suggested a superclass
> relationship, and therefore a combined dictionary.  I see now the
> improved syntax proposal which makes the absence much clearer.

Yeah, that has confused several people already. I wish I used the new
syntax in my original post, it really makes more sense. 


John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈ 

More information about the Haskell mailing list