[Haskell] PROPOSAL: class aliases
Philippa Cowderoy
flippa at flippac.org
Wed Oct 12 20:14:19 EDT 2005
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, John Meacham wrote:
> ideally we would want to split it up like so (but with more mathematically
> precise names):
>
Might it also be reasonable to provide less mathematical names for some
classes, and possibly allow users to let the compiler know which ones they
find more readable? A lot of users would find Mappable more intuitive than
Functor for example, and the improved error messages might make it more
practical to call fmap map again.
--
flippa at flippac.org
Ivanova is always right.
I will listen to Ivanova.
I will not ignore Ivanova's recomendations.
Ivanova is God.
And, if this ever happens again, Ivanova will personally rip your lungs out!
More information about the Haskell
mailing list