[Haskell] PROPOSAL: class aliases

Philippa Cowderoy flippa at flippac.org
Wed Oct 12 20:14:19 EDT 2005


On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, John Meacham wrote:

> ideally we would want to split it up like so (but with more mathematically
> precise names):
>

Might it also be reasonable to provide less mathematical names for some 
classes, and possibly allow users to let the compiler know which ones they 
find more readable? A lot of users would find Mappable more intuitive than 
Functor for example, and the improved error messages might make it more 
practical to call fmap map again.

-- 
flippa at flippac.org

Ivanova is always right. 
I will listen to Ivanova. 
I will not ignore Ivanova's recomendations. 
Ivanova is God. 
And, if this ever happens again, Ivanova will personally rip your lungs out!


More information about the Haskell mailing list