[Haskell] Re: Hierarchical module namespace extension not
sufficiently flexible
Andre Pang
ozone at algorithm.com.au
Mon Mar 7 01:39:33 EST 2005
On 06/03/2005, at 11:23 PM, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> We can do it too except that to use qualified names, users would have
> to
> import dozens of modules:
> import Graphics.UI.Gtk.This
> import Graphics.UI.Gtk.That
> import Graphics.UI.Gtk.TheOther.
Not that this is a fantastic solution (and perhaps you're doing this
already), but one technique is to make a module named Graphics.UI.Gtk
(i.e. Graphics/UI/Gtk.hs), which imports all the submodules for you and
re-exports all of them:
module Graphics.UI.Gtk
( Graphics.UI.Gtk.This
, Graphics.UI.Gtk.That
, Graphics.UI.Gtk.TheOther
)
where
import Graphics.UI.Gtk.This
import Graphics.UI.Gtk.That
import Graphics.UI.Gtk.TheOther
(or you can call the module Graphics.UI.Gtk.all, or something.) It's
somewhat feasible to do if you're machine-generating it, but obviously
pretty unmaintainable if you have to write it all by hand ...
--
% Andre Pang : trust.in.love.to.save
More information about the Haskell
mailing list