[Haskell] Typeable and Data instances for Double, FiniteMap, ...
Ralf.Laemmel at cwi.nl
Tue Jan 18 10:32:17 EST 2005
Georg Martius wrote:
> I was playing around with "Scap you Boilerplate" and realised some
> missing instances of Typeable and Data. Is there a particular reason
> why there is no Data Double instance?
There has been a Double instance under CVS (GHC HEAD) since March 2004.
It will be included in GHC 6.4.
(BTW, this email should go to glasgow-haskell-users perhaps?)
> Furthermore I was wondering why no instance for the collection types
> such as FiniteMap, Set and HashTable is provided.
Yes, once you start to use the SYB library you end up wanting it to
cover almost all your types.
I will make an effort *now* hoping that all the instance can still make
it into GHC 6,4.
(There are indeed a few more unsupported types that make obviously sense.)
> I looked at the library source-code (GHC) and reallised that there is
> really much documenting comments in, but which are not Haddock
> comments. Again I don't understand that. Is the programmer supposed to
> look at the source-code rather the API documentation?
I wonder how other Haskellers think of that.
I tend to use non-Haddock comments whenever I want to document
Is there an idiom for that; so that people get not confused?
More information about the Haskell