[Haskell] Re: Why is getArgs in the IO monad?
japple at freeshell.org
Tue Jan 18 03:15:25 EST 2005
I still think I'm missing your point, but let me take a stab at it.
Conal Elliott wrote:
> I'm suggesting you might better understand the
> why of Haskell if you think denotationally (here about the meaning of
> the [String] type), rather than operationally.
The meaning of a type seems to be about what happens operationally. "::
[String]" is an operational guarantee, so if we let "getArgs ::
[String]" that is a promise that there is some list of Strings at runtime.
> guessing that none of those 2^32+1 values is what you'd mean by "length
Well, I suppose I mean something like an existential type: there is some
Int that is length getArgs.
Even if this is denotationally different from a value like zero :: Int,
I think it is also different from getLine :: IO String. It seems to mean
something between these. I suppose my intuition is that it is closer to
More information about the Haskell