[Haskell] Re: Rebindable syntax for monads and arrows

Ashley Yakeley ashley at semantic.org
Tue Jan 11 01:08:48 EST 2005

Ben Rudiak-Gould wrote:

> Bug #1097046 aside, I don't see how this can possibly work. There's 
> nothing to prevent return from being passed an argument for which 
> there's no FinSet instance.

You're right, I guess it's not a monad after all, though you might be 
able to write the (>>=) function.

Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA

More information about the Haskell mailing list