[Haskell] Re: Boxing (Day) Question
Ashley Yakeley
ashley at semantic.org
Mon Dec 26 06:41:38 EST 2005
In article <43AFCA38.5000302 at augustsson.net>,
Lennart Augustsson <lennart at augustsson.net> wrote:
> On the whole it looks like you want type variables with kind #.
> There are very good implementation reasons for not allowing this.
> If you had type variables of kind # you could have polymorphic
> functions over unboxed values. But since the values are unboxed
> they don't have a uniform representation (e.g., a Double# is probably
> twice the size of a Float#). So polymorphic functions over unboxed
> values are not easy to implement. (You can imagine implementations
> of them, but none of them are pleasent.)
Oh, I hadn't thought of that.
One solution might be to have a kind for each kind of storage:
* for boxed values
#4 for 4-byte values
#8 for 8-byte values
#P for pointers to things that need to be GC'd (or whatever)
etc.
Do you think this would work?
--
Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA
More information about the Haskell
mailing list