[Haskell] existential type synonyms
John Meacham
john at repetae.net
Mon Dec 12 22:27:53 EST 2005
I was wondering if this would make sense
allow extensential type synonyms, so if you had something like the
following,
> data Type a = ....
you could declare a synonym such as
> type AnyType = exists a . Type a
so you can create functions such as
> areSame :: AnyType -> AnyType -> Bool
which would expand to
> areSame :: forall a b . Type a -> Type b -> Bool
this is opposed to the currently allowed in ghc
> type AllTypes = forall a . Type a
> oddFunc :: AllTypes -> AllTypes -> Bool
which expands to the rank 2 type
> oddFunc :: (forall a . Type a) -> (forall b . Type b) -> Bool
which means something quite different.
if we use 'exists' for existential types, this might be another useful
use of said name.
John
--
John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈
More information about the Haskell
mailing list