[Haskell] IO, exceptions and error handling
Tim Docker
timothy.docker at macquarie.com
Mon Jun 14 12:30:54 EDT 2004
Philippa Cowderoy wrote:
> The ability to fail doesn't need the do notation, just use of
> return for success - similar for propagating failure.
I'm not sure I understand. Do you mean writing functions
like:
sqr x | x < 0 = fail "less than zero"
| otherwise = return (sqrt x)
If so, I don't see how I can use this without either do
or >>=:
test x = do
v1 <- sqr x
v2 <- sqr (x+1)
return (v1+v2)
I can't (easily) write
text c = sqr x + sqr (x+1)
which was what I was getting at.
Tim
More information about the Haskell
mailing list