[Haskell] Re: Initialisation without unsafePerformIO

Chung-chieh Shan ccshan at post.harvard.edu
Fri Jun 4 13:04:53 EDT 2004

On 2004-06-04T03:35:25-0700, John Meacham wrote:
> Yeah, such an extension would need to ensure initializers are
> monomorphic. another advantage of a special syntax rather than
> unsafePerformIO.

A next thing to worry about is the order of initialization, especially
when mutually recursive imports are involved.

Edit this signature at http://www.digitas.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/ken/sig
unsafePerformIO is NOT Haskell!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://www.haskell.org//pipermail/haskell/attachments/20040604/5387e3d7/attachment.bin

More information about the Haskell mailing list