[Haskell] Re: Implicit parameters redux

Ashley Yakeley ashley at semantic.org
Thu Jan 29 02:26:41 EST 2004

In article <Pine.LNX.4.21.0401271448560.7939-100000 at dark.darkweb.com>,
 Ben Rudiak-Gould <benrg at dark.darkweb.com> wrote:

> Another extension I proposed is that the "name" of an implicit return
> value can include type parameters: thus %foo Int and %foo Char would be
> treated as though they had different names.

This bit doesn't seem very polymorphic-friendly?

Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA

More information about the Haskell mailing list