> > Thus, the only possible lexical interpretation is the one you first
> > suggested, namely a constructor "A" followed by a three-dot operator
> > "...".
> A... should be split into "A.." and "."
I found a compromise: let's make it a lexing error! :-)
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk
\__/ qrczak at knm.org.pl
^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/