Ann: HAllInOne bug fix release

[Hal Daume]

Ah, apparently it is not (at least not the Cygwin version).

I recompiled NHC with GHC -O2, both the separate compilation version and
the all-in-over version.  Averaged over five runs, we see that the
separate compilation version is actually *faster* than the ai1 version:

standard nhc compiled with ghc:

real    0m27.167s
user    0m9.991s
sys     0m1.304s

nhc all-in-one:

real    0m31.411s
user    0m10.007s
sys     0m1.299s



i am completely unable to explain this.  someone want to hazard a guess?

 - hal, who is a bit disappointed now :(

 --
 Hal Daume III                                   | hdaume@isi.edu
 "Arrest this man, he talks in maths."           | www.isi.edu/~hdaume


> -----Original Message-----
> From: haskell-admin@haskell.org=20
> [mailto:haskell-admin@haskell.org] On Behalf Of Wolfgang Jeltsch
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 2:59 PM
> To: The Haskell Mailing List
> Subject: Re: Ann: HAllInOne bug fix release
>=20
>=20
> On Wednesday, 2003-07-30, 23:36, CEST, Hal Daume III wrote:
> > [...]
>=20
> > A few people have asked me for speed-up results from=20
> All-In-One-ifying code,
> > so here's a good one.  We take two versions of NHC.  One is=20
> the original
> > binary distribution and the other is the All-In-One-ified=20
> version, compiled
> > by GHC.
>=20
> Hi,
>=20
> is the original binary distribution compiled with GHC? If=20
> not, the speed-up=20
> may also be the result of using a different compiler (i.e., GHC).
>=20
> > [...]
>=20
> Wolfgang
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell mailing list
> Haskell@haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell
>=20