silly questions about 'seq'
Koen Claessen
koen@cs.chalmers.se
Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:30:31 +0100 (MET)
John Meacham wondered:
| what does it mean to apply 'seq' to a function? how
| does one place an abstraction in WHNF? it seems that
| the ONLY thing one can do to a function is apply it to
| some argument so does seq need to apply the function
| to a dummy argument or something?
Here is a simple example:
funs :: [Int -> Int]
funs = [ \x -> x + i | i <- [1..] ]
f :: Int -> Int
f = funs !! 1000000
Calculating f, without applying it to arguments, really
takes some time.
Hope this helps,
/Koen
--
Koen Claessen
http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~koen
Chalmers University, Gothenburg, Sweden.