silly questions about 'seq'

John Meacham john@repetae.net
Wed, 12 Feb 2003 16:54:46 -0800


I have some questions about the implementation of haskell... 

what does it mean to apply 'seq' to a function? how does one place an
abstraction in WHNF? it seems that the ONLY thing one can do to a
function is apply it to some argument so does seq need to apply the
function to a dummy argument or something?

similarly, how does seq work on polymorphic types? without knowing what
the unboxed representation is for a type, it seems tricky to know how to
place it in WHNF...

	John
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Meacham - California Institute of Technology, Alum. - john@foo.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------------