Super Haddock

[Ferenc Wagner]

Jorge Adriano <jadrian@mat.uc.pt> writes:

> On Friday 25 April 2003 09:09, Ketil Z. Malde wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure I would like this.  I guess I'm one of (the
>> apparently very few?) who are using LaTeX lhs style
>> (using \begin/\end{code}).  Would a Haddock replacement
>> give me the same kind of functionality in producing a
>> nice printable copy?  I definitely have grown attached to
>> having math, footnotes, page headings, sections, and so
>> on.
>
> That makes two of us.
> I've been doing almost all my haskell work using lhs files
> + LaTeX, and I'd really miss it if was removed
> someday. Haddock documentation seems very nice but it
> serves a diferent purpose.

Chalk up one more.

Is it possible to use lhs + LaTeX + Haddock (as it is)
together meaningfully?  If not, will it be?

                                                Feri.