class Function ?

[Nick Name]

On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 16:16:16 -0800 (PST)
Hal Daume III <hdaume@ISI.EDU> wrote:

>  You can't have "invisible functions".

The only thing that should be done is to invent a special name for the
juxtaposition operator (or just to use $), and to let (->) become an
instance of the "Function" class.

I'd also like this, because it would enable stuff like associative maps
used as functions.

Vincenzo

-- 
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you,
then they fight you, then you win.
[Gandhi]