Module re-exportation weekend puzzler

[Iavor S. Diatchki]

hi,

sorry for the double post yesterday, thomas had some sort of a problem 
sending mail to the list, so i sent the message instead, but i guess 
eventually both messages ended up being posted.

Simon Peyton-Jones wrote:

> So I am happy to adopt your interpretation, but I'd like to clarify 
> the wording.
> Here's an alternative sentence:
>    The form "module M" names the set of all entities that are in
>    scope with both an unqualified name 'e' and a qualified name
>    'M.e'.
>
> Would that be better?  Can you suggest anything else?

i think this formulation is better.

bye
iavor


-- 
==================================================
| Iavor S. Diatchki, Ph.D. student               |
| Department of Computer Science and Engineering |
| School of OGI at OHSU                          |
| http://www.cse.ogi.edu/~diatchki               |
==================================================