AW: slide: useful function?
Andrew J Bromage
ajb@spamcop.net
Tue, 3 Dec 2002 10:26:32 +1100
G'day all.
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 10:27:21AM +0100, John Hughes wrote:
> There are patterns of that sort in our programs, which we would probably
> rather call design techniques, which aren't so easily captured by a
> higher-order function definition.
As a matter of interest, _why_ would we rather call them "design
techniques" than "design patterns"? Is it just an aversion to
buzzwords, or are they fundamentally different?
Cheers,
Andrew Bromage