unsafePerformIO to give warnings
Simon Marlow
simonmar@microsoft.com
Fri, 21 Dec 2001 10:21:06 -0000
> If I want to give warnings when doing something and I don't care too
> much about the order they appear in, can I use this?
>=20
> foo x =3D if success x then Just x
> else warn "Working out x went wrong" Nothing
>=20
> warn :: String -> a -> a
> warn s x =3D unsafePerformIO (hPutStrLn stderr s) `seq` x
This is what IOExts.trace is for, BTW.
> The hslibs docs say
>=20
> If the I/O computation wrapped in unsafePerformIO performs side
> effects, then the relative order in which those side effects take
> place (relative to the main I/O trunk, or other calls to
> unsafePerformIO) is indeterminate.
>=20
> but it's not entirely clear on whether or not I could end up with 2
> warnings interspersed?
It is possible to get warnings interspersed if you write something like
warn ("abc" ++ warn "foo" "def")
> And is it guaranteed that the warnings will be printed at some point?
All that is guaranteed is that if an expression 'warn a b' is evaluated
then 'a' will be evaluated to a String and then printed.
> hugs and ghci only seem to print the first warning, but ISTR similar
> problems happen with threads and got the impression that they were in
> the wrong.
Are you sure that laziness and/or optimisation aren't to blame for only
getting a single warning? Given that you say Hugs also produces the
same result, it sounds like a laziness issue.
Cheers,
Simon