Remove eq and show from num class

[Carter Schonwald]

well sure, i'm happy to write the 3 line diff, but because of the sheer
unambiguity of this i'd rather get the votes on email before botthering to
write the diff, at which point the main question is whether i wrote the
diff correctly


please say yes or no. its quite easy with email . i'm not going to write
that little proposal if folks wont accept it :)

On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 11:44 PM, Mario Blazevic <mblazevic at stilo.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 6:20 PM, Richard Eisenberg <rae at cs.brynmawr.edu>
> wrote:
>
>> I don't mean to be a killjoy, but I think even something as simple as
>> this should have a proposal. We still have to draft the changes to the
>> Report associated with this change, and at least one is non-obvious: now
>> numeric literals induce an Eq constraint (which should be mentioned). I'm
>> certainly not against this change, but I don't think it's as easy as this.
>>
>
> I agree. I just I thought it was implicit that every change to the report
> goes throught a pull request, which is the same as a proposal. Were you
> volunteering for something else, Carter?
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-prime/attachments/20170908/875575a6/attachment.html>