Shall the Haskell Report remain in LaTeX?

[Nicolas Wu]

It’s a yes from me for us to be using LaTeX, but I think it might be useful to use lhs2TeX to generate the LaTeX.

lhs2TeX makes it possible for us to write literate Haskell files as the source to the Report, which in turn allows us to type-check much of the code we write, which is nice.

Best wishes,

Nick



> On 30 Oct 2017, at 15:39, Mario Blažević <blamario at ciktel.net> wrote:
> 
> On 2017-09-09 09:40 AM, Herbert Valerio Riedel wrote:
>> Long story short, is everyone ok to stay with (La)TeX, or is there some
>> compelling reason that would justify migrating to a different
>> documentation system?
> 
> 
> Since nobody said no in the 7 weeks since, I think it's safe to assume yes. Can we proceed with this now?
> 
> Once the report is a part of the RFCs repository, I assume it will become the proper home that pull requests https://github.com/haskell/haskell-report/pull/3 (if also accompanied by an RFC).
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-prime mailing list
> Haskell-prime at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime