Haskell 2020: 'let' to be optional and with wider scope of visibility, like other Haskell functions

[Sven Panne]

2017-04-17 14:19 GMT+02:00 Adam Bergmark <adam at bergmark.nl>:

> I just wanted to say that there is no need to apologize for making a
> proposal!
>

+1 for that, and sorry if I sounded harsh, that wasn't my intention.
Proposals are important (we need more of them, not less), and so are
discussions about them. Nothing would be worse than a dead language nobody
cares about...
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-prime/attachments/20170417/314b65fb/attachment.html>