Process question

[Mario Blažević]

On 2016-10-04 01:09 PM, Iavor Diatchki wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Now that we've started with a few proposal, I am realizing that I have
> no idea how to proceed from here.  In particular:
>
> 1. How would I request I proposal to be rejected
> 2. How would I request that a proposal be accepted

	I don't know if we need to fix the acceptance/rejection process so 
early on. Once a new proposal is merged in, it need not be immediately 
accepted or rejected. It could just collect comments and adjustments. I 
see no point in voting for acceptance or rejection until the time comes 
to prepare Haskell 2020.

	If my understanding of the process is correct, this raises two more 
groups of questions.

1. I assume we'd use GitHub issues to discuss and/or point flaws in a 
particular proposal?

1a. If so, it would be nice to group together all issues related to a 
paricular proposal, but GitHub issues don't come with much metadata. Do 
we prescribe some keyword that has to be specified in the subject of 
each proposal-related issue?

1b. There could be a special "Accept me" issue for each proposal used 
for tracking its status. GitHub issues can be assigned to milestones, 
such as "Accepted for Haskell2020", "Last Call for Votes", "Awaiting 
Comments", or "Work In Progress".

2. How do we prepare the actual Haskell 2020 language report? The report 
is more than a collection of disparate proposals. The Haskell 2010 
report also contains errors whose fixing shouldn't require writing up a 
whole language proposal.

2a. Would the current text of the Haskell' language report be stored in 
the same GitHub repository with the RFCs? If not, where else?

2b. Would we merge each proposal into the language report as soon as 
it's accepted? Whose responsibility would this (largely mechanical) 
process be?