Proposal: Include InstanceSigs

[Joachim Breitner]

Hi,

Am Dienstag, den 01.11.2016, 19:43 +0100 schrieb David Luposchainsky:
> On 01.11.2016 16:59, Joachim Breitner wrote:
> > As a teacher who uses live coding in a text editor, I usually write out
> > all type signatures. Not being able to do that for instance methods is
> > a minor annoyance.
> > 
> > So I guess by sending this mail I started the proposal process
> > properly?
> 
> Hi Joachim,
> 
> great to see you tune in! We’re currently trying out a Github-based process. If
> you want, you could write up a proposal here [1], or at least make a reminder
> post-it-ticket here [2] so maybe someone else does. :-)

done:

https://github.com/haskell/rfcs/pull/13

I did not copy the detailed description from the GHC manual to the
proposal yet. Is it ok to defer that until the proposal has been
approved, or at least until approval is known to be likely?

Greetings,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim “nomeata” Breitner
  mail at joachim-breitner.de • https://www.joachim-breitner.de/
  XMPP: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de • OpenPGP-Key: 0xF0FBF51F
  Debian Developer: nomeata at debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mail.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-prime/attachments/20161101/6ba86808/attachment.sig>