Codifying language extensions in Report

Sat Aug 20 02:38:46 UTC 2016

I personally think this should be in scope. And indeed the Haskell 2010 Report does codify several extensions in Section 12.3.

Richard

> On Aug 19, 2016, at 9:57 PM, M Farkas-Dyck <m.farkasdyck at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Is this in scope? I.e. a conformant Haskell implementation must allow
> the extension, but using it remains optional.
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-prime mailing list
> Haskell-prime at haskell.org
> http://mail.haskell.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime