ekmett at gmail.com
Tue May 28 17:59:27 CEST 2013
Yes, but that leaves the an objection I have to this proposal requiring me
personally to write an extra 1691 import lines -- based on the contents of
my local development folder, to just get back up to par with the status quo.
As a flag I can turn on in a package to get finer grained control? I'm
totally for it!
As a source of *mandatory* boilerplate at the head of each module? It
doesn't strike me as a good trade-off.
On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Ian Lynagh <ian at well-typed.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:41:44AM -0400, Edward Kmett wrote:
> > I'm definitely in favor of having the *option* to shut off the import of
> > the Prelude without entangling the notion of overriding all of the
> > desugarings.
> > I do, however, feel that removing the Prelude from base is a rather
> > step, which hasn't seen much support.
> Just to clarify: This proposal is to stop importing the module
> implicitly, not to actually remove the module.
> Ian Lynagh, Haskell Consultant
> Well-Typed LLP, http://www.well-typed.com/
> Haskell-prime mailing list
> Haskell-prime at haskell.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Haskell-prime