Status of Haskell'?

[Nate Soares]

> it might be wise to see what GHC decides to do on that front, first,

I'd argue that it's not. Haskell hasn't had a release in years, and I think
it's time to put a little pressure on the community.


On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Ben Millwood <haskell at benmachine.co.uk>wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Ian Lynagh <igloo at earth.li> wrote:
> > [...] adding DeriveDataTypeable
> > hopefully wouldn't be too controversial [...]
>
> This is a little tricky since the Data class itself makes (essential,
> I think) use of Rank2Types. Typeable ought to be fine, but it might be
> wise to see what GHC decides to do on that front, first, e.g. whether
> it's going to autoderive all instances or forbid user instances or
> anything else similarly bold.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-prime mailing list
> Haskell-prime at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-prime/attachments/20121127/00590c86/attachment.htm>