Proposal: Scoping rule change

Greg Weber greg at
Tue Jul 24 02:45:39 CEST 2012

sounds good. will there be a shadowing warning?

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 5:28 PM, Lennart Augustsson
<lennart at> wrote:
> It's not often that one gets the chance to change something as
> fundamental as the scoping rules of a language.  Nevertheless, I would
> like to propose a change to Haskell's scoping rules.
> The change is quite simple.  As it is, top level entities in a module
> are in the same scope as all imported entities.  I suggest that this
> is changed to that the entities from the module are in an inner scope
> and do not clash with imported identifiers.
> Why?  Consider the following snippet
>     module M where
>     import I
>     foo = True
> Assume this compiles.  Now change the module I so it exports something
> called foo.  After this change the module M no longer compiles since
> (under the current scoping rules) the imported foo clashes with the
> foo in M.
> Pros: Module compilation becomes more robust under library changes.
> Fewer imports with hiding are necessary.
> Cons: There's the chance that you happen to define a module identifier
> with the same name as something imported.  This will typically lead to
> a type error, but there is a remote chance it could have the same
> type.
> Implementation status: The Mu compiler has used the scoping rule for
> several years now and it works very well in practice.
>   -- Lennart
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-prime mailing list
> Haskell-prime at

More information about the Haskell-prime mailing list