Announce: ~Haskell 2011
malcolm.wallace at me.com
Sat Jan 8 10:32:12 CET 2011
On 7 Jan 2011, at 22:25, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> Have you considered deciding about individual proposals as and when
> are completed, rather than making a decision about all proposals each
> September? This could also avoid merge-conflicts between the report
> deltas for proposals that touch the same bit of the report.
I can see advantages and disadvantages of both approaches -
incremental decisions vs a single time-limited big decision. I think
it all depends on the engagement of the community. If there is clear
consensus from the community on a particular proposal, I can imagine
the committee incrementally accepting it. If consensus is not clear,
I think a decision is likely to be deferred until voting-time.
More information about the Haskell-prime