new keyword: infixlr?
nbowler at elliptictech.com
Mon Sep 13 10:23:05 EDT 2010
On 2010-09-10 19:13 +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote:
> When first reading the proposal, I thought the idea was to allow the
> compiler to more easily perform optimisations like
> a+b+c+2+3+d => a+b+c+5+d
Of course, since I don't think fixity can be specified per-instance of
Num, one would not be able to use this proposal for this; not all Num
instances have an associative (+).
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
More information about the Haskell-prime