fw at deneb.enyo.de
Wed Sep 16 16:31:29 EDT 2009
* Don Stewart:
>> Are there any plans to get rid of hGetContents and the semi-closed
>> handle state for Haskell Prime?
>> (I call hGetContents unsafe because it adds side effects to pattern
>> matching, stricly speaking invalidating most of the transformations
>> which are expected to be valid in a pure language.)
> Isn't this a broader complaint about lazy IO in general?
Yes, sort of. But doesn't lazy input derive its justification from
being present in the prelude?
More information about the Haskell-prime