StricterLabelledFieldSyntax

[Ian Lynagh]

On Sun, Jul 26, 2009 at 09:40:40AM +0200, Sean Leather wrote:
> > I've made a ticket and proposal page for making the labelled field
> > syntax stricter
> >
> 
> I'm definitely in favor of this change. I only have an issue with calling it
> "stricter." Maybe it's just me, but strictness doesn't provoke the expected
> image in this case. More like lower precedence.

I'm happy with it being given a different name.

> Would it be useful to add an example with the appropriate parentheses?

I'm not sure I understand what sort of an example you want. Isn't
    Just (A {x = 5})
one?


Thanks
Ian