Proposal: ExplicitForall
Samuel Bronson
naesten at gmail.com
Fri Jul 24 11:26:58 EDT 2009
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Niklas Broberg<niklas.broberg at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Alright, let's set an actual discussion period of 2 weeks for
>> ExplicitForall. If there is no opposition by then, we can add
>> ExplicitForall to the registered extensions in cabal as a first step.
>
> Slightly more than two weeks later, there has been no voices against
> and at least a few in favor.
Huh. I guess I forgot I could reply? In favour I am. (Even if I do
live in the US. </spelling-related-joke>)
More information about the Haskell-prime
mailing list