Proposal: ExplicitForall

Samuel Bronson naesten at
Fri Jul 24 11:26:58 EDT 2009

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:36 AM, Niklas Broberg<niklas.broberg at> wrote:
>> Alright, let's set an actual discussion period of 2 weeks for
>> ExplicitForall. If there is no opposition by then, we can add
>> ExplicitForall to the registered extensions in cabal as a first step.
> Slightly more than two weeks later, there has been no voices against
> and at least a few in favor.

Huh. I guess I forgot I could reply? In favour I am. (Even if I do
live in the US. </spelling-related-joke>)

More information about the Haskell-prime mailing list