what about moving the record system to an addendum?
ravi at bluespec.com
Tue Jul 7 10:23:16 EDT 2009
I've suggested some sort of standardization of the LANGUAGE pragma as
well. Given our new modular, yearly approach to standardization, it
does seem worth trying to formalize it.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Bulat
Ziganshin<bulat.ziganshin at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Duncan,
> Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 2:15:42 AM, you wrote:
>> For one thing the spec currently says that pragmas cannot change the
>> semantics of the program. That would have to read "apart from the
>> LANGUAGE pragma".
> sometime ago i've proposed to make a "language" statement a part of
> haskell. i don't insist on this but at least keep this possibility in
> mind - making it a pragma is a poor man solution
> Best regards,
> Bulat mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin at gmail.com
> Haskell-prime mailing list
> Haskell-prime at haskell.org
More information about the Haskell-prime