what about moving the record system to an addendum?

Ravi Nanavati ravi at bluespec.com
Tue Jul 7 10:23:16 EDT 2009

I've suggested some sort of standardization of the LANGUAGE pragma as
well. Given our new modular, yearly approach to standardization, it
does seem worth trying to formalize it.

 - Ravi

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 7:12 AM, Bulat
Ziganshin<bulat.ziganshin at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Duncan,
> Tuesday, July 7, 2009, 2:15:42 AM, you wrote:
>> For one thing the spec currently says that pragmas cannot change the
>> semantics of the program. That would have to read "apart from the
>> LANGUAGE pragma".
> sometime ago i've proposed to make a "language" statement a part of
> haskell. i don't insist on this but at least keep this possibility in
> mind - making it a pragma is a poor man solution
> --
> Best regards,
>  Bulat                            mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin at gmail.com
> _______________________________________________
> Haskell-prime mailing list
> Haskell-prime at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime

More information about the Haskell-prime mailing list