lennart at augustsson.net
Sun Jan 25 06:18:01 EST 2009
I don't know what you want it to mean, so I can't answer that. :)
I doubt anyone has ever used a VT on purpose. I know I haven't.
I regard it as a lexical quirk.
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Jon Fairbairn
<jon.fairbairn at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
> Lennart Augustsson <lennart at augustsson.net> writes:
>> But VT is allowed in Haskell.
> Gosh, so it is. It's been a while since I looked, and I've
> no recollection of the discussion that made it part of
> whitechar. But does it mean what I want it to mean? Does
> anyone actually use it? Are there any occurrences of it in
> Haskell programmes that aren't mistakes?
> Jón Fairbairn Jon.Fairbairn at cl.cam.ac.uk
> http://www.chaos.org.uk/~jf/Stuff-I-dont-want.html (updated 2008-04-26)
> Haskell-prime mailing list
> Haskell-prime at haskell.org
More information about the Haskell-prime