bug in language definition (strictness)

Thomas Davie tatd2 at kent.ac.uk
Thu Aug 6 08:49:10 EDT 2009


On 6 Aug 2009, at 14:37, Nils Anders Danielsson wrote:

> On 2009-08-06 11:08, Malcolm Wallace wrote:
>> yet, because of the definition of $!, this applies the constructor  
>> to its arguments right-to-left instead of the intuitive left-to- 
>> right.
>
> I do not think that there is a bug: x `seq` y `seq` e has the same
> denotation as y `seq` x `seq` e.

Not if one considers the "kind" of bottom one receives:

undefined `seq` error "it exploded" `seq` e will print  
"Prelude.undefined"
while
error "it exploded" `seq` undefined `seq` e will print "Error: it  
exploded"

Bob


More information about the Haskell-prime mailing list