Tackling the atrocious squad
barsoap at web.de
Tue May 6 22:56:57 EDT 2008
"Lennart Augustsson" <lennart at augustsson.net>
> And what's the denotational semantics of type classes? As far as I
> know it has never been done, because it's very complex.
I have no idea whatsoever, but dare to say that the target language
just isn't appropriate, iff it turns out to be complex.
As a matter of taste, I'd go for axiomatic semantics instead,
exspecially if considering metacircularity. Lisp, for example, can be
reduced to get! == set!, leaving all the confusion as an implementation
(c) this sig last receiving data processing entity. Inspect headers for
past copyright information. All rights reserved. Unauthorised copying,
hiring, renting, public performance and/or broadcasting of this
More information about the Haskell-prime