Consistency of reserved operators and bang patterns
john at repetae.net
Thu Sep 27 20:46:13 EDT 2007
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 09:24:51PM -0300, Isaac Dupree wrote:
> >Oh, and while we are at it, I think (:) should also be removed as a
> >reservedop, there is no reason for it to be on that list.
> Backwards compatibility requires that it be implicitly imported from
> Prelude even in a module that does "import Prelude ( )" (although Hugs
> is already broken in this regard). And that makes it fairly useless as
> a non-reserved symbol. If not for that issue, I agree.
jhc is also broken in this regard. (:) is treated like any other
John Meacham - ⑆repetae.net⑆john⑈
More information about the Haskell-prime