List syntax (was: Re: help from the community?)

[Ulf Norell]

On Feb 3, 2007, at 6:35 AM, Douglas Philips wrote:

> Well, if we're going to bring personal points of view in, it highly  
> pisses me off that in a construct such as:
> ( expr ,
>   expr ,
>   expr ,
>   expr ,
>   expr ,
> )
> I have to be vigilant to remove that trailing comma when it is in  
> _no way_ ambiguous.

How about instead writing

( expr
, expr
, expr
, expr
, expr
)

The only extra work is when inserting an element at the beginning,  
but you have the same problem in your example.

/ Ulf