[Haskell-cafe] Fractional/negative fixity?
haskell at henning-thielemann.de
Tue Nov 7 11:15:12 EST 2006
On Tue, 7 Nov 2006, Simon Marlow wrote:
> I'd support fractional and negative fixity. It's a simple change to
> make, but we also have to adopt
> I've added the proposal to the end of that page. In fact, the page
> already mentioned that we could generalise fixity levels, but it didn't
> mention fractional or negative values being allowed.
Maybe that page could also mention earlier proposals and the solutions
without precedence numbers. I prefer the non-numeric approach with rules
like "(<) binds more tightly than (&&)", because it says what is intended
and it allows to make things unrelated that are unrelated, e.g. infix
operators from different libraries. Consequently a precedence relation to
general infix operators like ($) and (.) had be defined in each library.
More information about the Haskell-prime