the MPTC Dilemma (please solve)
Manuel M T Chakravarty
chak at cse.unsw.edu.au
Mon Mar 20 10:45:15 EST 2006
Ross Paterson:
> On Sun, Mar 19, 2006 at 11:25:44AM -0500, Manuel M T Chakravarty wrote:
> > My statement remains: Why use a relational notation if you can have a
> > functional one?
>
> I agree that functions on static data are more attractive than logic
> programming at the type level. But with associated type synonyms,
> the type level is not a functional language but a functional-logic one.
Your are right, of course.
<Hand-waving-alert>
However, the evaluation model is what is known as "residuation"
in the FL community, which is essentially functional programming
with logic variables and lenient evaluation (a la Id). As long
as we only have strongly normalising functions, lenient
evaluation and lazy evaluation coincide. So, for Haskell
programmers, we are on familiar ground.
</Hand-waving-alert>
Manuel
More information about the Haskell-prime
mailing list