Keep the present Haskell record system!
lennart at augustsson.net
Mon Mar 6 01:50:24 EST 2006
Yes, I've read the article too. And I really like the record system.
But an off-hand remark like that doesn't convince me.
Daan, what's your opinion?
Jim Apple wrote:
> On 3/6/06, Lennart Augustsson <lennart at augustsson.net> wrote:
>> Can it be implemented efficiently?
> Section 8, p. 8:
> "This leads to a simple compilation scheme that gives constant access
> to labels, but avoids the many runtime parameters for extension. The
> extension operation is done dynamically but since it is O(n) anyway,
> we expect that the runtime penalty is negligible."
> Haskell-prime mailing list
> Haskell-prime at haskell.org
More information about the Haskell-prime