more flexible partial application
dinko.tenev at gmail.com
Sun Jan 29 06:27:03 EST 2006
On 1/27/06, Wolfgang Jeltsch <wolfgang at jeltsch.net> wrote:
> Am Freitag, 27. Januar 2006 12:15 schrieb Dinko Tenev:
> > [...]
> > About the whole extension, (f x _ z) is arguably clearer than \y -> f
> > x y z,
> For me, it's really not clearer. (f x _ z) looks like an application of f to
> three arguments since _ looks like a special expression (similar to _ in
> patterns being a special pattern).
I feel tempted to argue to the contrary, but at this point of the
argument, I think it's already a matter of personal preference.
More information about the Haskell-prime