First class labels
simonpj at microsoft.com
Fri Feb 10 03:49:36 EST 2006
| To make up for this, I've now extended the example code to
| include more operations, cryptic infix operators, and more
| type class tricks (we have examples of record field selection,
| symmetric record concatenation, record field removal, record
| field update, record field renaming).
I did read your message. I'm afraid I couldn't figure out exactly what
you were proposing, so I filed it hoping that the ensuing discussion
would clarify. For example, what does it mean to "remove the need to
declare labels, make them identifiable as such in use"? I had similar
questions about your other two options.
Then, the code that you enclosed appeared to show that you could do
without any extension at all.
Records are a huge swamp with a very large number of possible variants
and design choices. Perhaps you might gain more traction if you were
ruthlessly specific about what language changes you advocate, and what
benefits they would have (versus the existing situation).
More information about the Haskell-prime