strict Haskell dialect

Philippa Cowderoy flippa at
Wed Feb 1 10:44:37 EST 2006

On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Creighton Hogg wrote:

> I apologize in advance if I say something silly, but 
> wouldn't such a language transformation be a use for 
> Template Haskell?  Superficially, it seems like you should 
> be able to do that.

It can, but so far it's really ugly to apply transformations to entire 
modules. A little syntactic sugar could be good there.

flippa at

"My religion says so" explains your beliefs. But it doesn't explain 
why I should hold them as well, let alone be restricted by them.

More information about the Haskell-prime mailing list