strict Haskell dialect

[Philippa Cowderoy]

On Wed, 1 Feb 2006, Creighton Hogg wrote:

> I apologize in advance if I say something silly, but 
> wouldn't such a language transformation be a use for 
> Template Haskell?  Superficially, it seems like you should 
> be able to do that.
> 

It can, but so far it's really ugly to apply transformations to entire 
modules. A little syntactic sugar could be good there.

-- 
flippa at flippac.org

"My religion says so" explains your beliefs. But it doesn't explain 
why I should hold them as well, let alone be restricted by them.