unsafePerformIO and cooperative concurrency
ashley at semantic.org
Mon Apr 24 15:08:29 EDT 2006
Simon Marlow wrote:
> Given that unsafePerformIO is (perhaps) to be part of the Haskell'
Is there a ticket for this? I would prefer that unsafePerformIO and
friends not be part of the standard.
At risk of drifting off-topic, I think it would be better to find
examples where unsafePerformIO is needed and used safely, and come up
with safe functions for that (but not necessarily as part of the Prime
effort). IIRC the darcs code uses it a lot.
Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA
More information about the Haskell-prime