FDs and confluence

Ross Paterson ross at soi.city.ac.uk
Tue Apr 11 09:14:43 EDT 2006

On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 06:48:35PM +0100, Claus Reinke wrote:
> note also that we are talking about different things here: I am talking 
> about FD consistency, you are talking about the FD consistency condition.

That would explain a few things.

> as this example shows once again, there are instance declarations 
> for which the FD consistency condition, as currently interpreted by 
> Hugs, fails, even though no inconsistent constraints are implied. so I 
> fail to see the point of continuing to require the FD consistency
> condition in unrevised form.

Do you have a revised set of restrictions on the form of instances?

More information about the Haskell-prime mailing list