deeqSeq proposal

John Meacham john at
Wed Apr 5 19:51:43 EDT 2006

On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 10:34:09AM -0500, Spencer Janssen wrote:
> How about an implementation that sets the deepSeq'd bit *after* each
> field has been successfully deepSeq'd?  deepSeq'ing a cyclic structure
> would behave just like an infinite structure.

what would be the point of having a bit then?

in any case, we should talk about the meaning of deepseqing something,
not its implementation.

depth limited recursive seq seems like the best route to me.


John Meacham - ⑆⑆john⑈

More information about the Haskell-prime mailing list